Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (13)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (62)
- Conference Proceeding (114)
- Contribution to a Periodical (25)
- Lecture (7)
- Internet Paper (2)
- Report (2)
- Working Paper (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (232)
Keywords
- 02 (15)
- 03 (9)
- 04 (1)
- 5G (2)
- 7. EU-Forschungsrahmenprogramm (1)
- AI (2)
- APMS (1)
- APS (1)
- Aachener PPS-Modell (1)
- Ablauforganisation (1)
Institute
- Business Transformation (10)
- Dienstleistungsmanagement (67)
- FIR e. V. an der RWTH Aachen (232)
- Informationsmanagement (51)
- Produktionsmanagement (115)
Ziel des Forschungsbereichs "Selbstoptimierende Produktionssysteme" ist es, sowohl technische als auch soziotechnische Produktionssysteme zu entwickeln, die durch Selbstoptimierung eine bessere Performance erreichen, als bei der Auslegung geplant und erwartet werden kann. Im Fokus steht die Steigerung der Produktivität in der Produktion direkt vor Ort. Bedeutend ist die dezentrale Entscheidungsfähigkeit der Mitarbeiter auf dem Shopfloor und in unterstützenden Bereichen, sowie der kognitiven und adaptiven Systeme und Netzwerke in der Produktion.
The growth of installed wind capacities generated a market with a huge variety of service offers for operation & maintenance of wind turbines. Different parties like manufacturers, component suppliers as well as independent service providers compete for the attractive after sales market. An innovative service offer which seems to meet the customers’ requirements is the guarantee of availability for wind turbines. However, these service providers are facing new challenges regarding their performance potentials and their financial risks occurring from possible penalties. Service providers have to reconsider their preparedness of performance, their new occurring financials risks, their cooperation and qualification level as well as their localization of service bases. To be able to quantify these new challenges and risks a simulation model has been designed in the context of a German research project named “WinServ”.
Soziale Medien kommen heute in vielen Unternehmensbereichen wie dem Kundenservice, dem Marketing, dem Innovationsmanagement oder dem Personalmanagement zum Einsatz. Beispiele hierfür sind weit verbreitete Kundenforen, interne Wissensplattformen, eine Präsenz auf Facebook oder Open- Innovation-Communitys. Nutzen stiften diese sogenannten Business-Communitys im Besonderen bei wissensintensiven Aufgaben. Des Weiteren versprechen sie durch Integration in die Wertschöpfung erhebliche Produktivitätspotenziale. Dabei ist davon auszugehen, dass die Nutzung von Business-Communitys die Prozesse und die Kultur ganzer Unternehmen zukünftig entscheidend verändern wird.
In der Praxis mangelt es jedoch aktuell an geeigneten Erkenntnissen über eine erfolgreiche Steuerung ebensolcher Business-Communitys. Dies führt dazu, dass das häufig klassische, hierarchisch strukturierte Management in Unternehmen die Potenziale von Business-Communitys in der Praxis nicht heben kann. Dazu hat das FIR an der RWTH Aachen zusammen mit der IntraWorlds GmbH eine Studie unter Community-Managern durchgeführt, welche die Erfolgswirkungen von Koordinationsmechanismen für Business-Communitys untersucht.
Aachener PPS-Modell
(2012)
Die Produktionsplanung und -steuerung bildet heute nach wie vor den Kern eines jeden Industrieunternehmens. Entgegen bisweilen kurzzeitigen Trends, die sich in immer wieder als „modern“ und „zeitgemäß“ proklamierten Konzepten äußern, hält das Aachener PPS-Modell am Betrachtungsansatz des ganzheitlichen Produk-tionssystems fest. Ressourcen und Prozesse eines Unternehmens und darüber hinaus auch die der Zulieferer müssen auf den Nutzen des Kunden bzw. auf die Wertschöpfung für den Kunden abgestimmt sein. Im Vordergrund steht die Optimierung des gesamten Produktionssystems. Produktionssysteme beschreiben die ganzheitliche Produktionsorganisation und beinhalten die Darstellung aller Konzepte, Methoden und Werkzeuge, die in ihrem Zusammenwirken die Effektivität und Effizienz des gesamten Produktionsablaufes ausmachen. Die Orientierung am Kundennutzen muss dabei wei-testgehend unter Vermeidung von Verschwendung erfolgen. Dafür stehen heute die Begriffe "Production System" und "Lean Thinking".Die Produktionsplanung und -steuerung ist der wesentliche Baustein eines Produktionssystems.
Die Entwicklung des Aachener PPS-Modells erfolgte mit dem Ziel, die ganzheitliche Betrachtungsweise durch Abstraktion bzw. Vereinfachung in der modellhaften Abbildung aller relevanten Zusammenhänge in der PPS zu unterstützen. Dabei lässt sich feststellen, dass eine ganzheitliche Betrachtung des Produktionssystems mit dem Fokus auf die PPS mit einem hohen Komplexitätsgrad einhergeht. Der Gesamtumfang einer solchen ganzheitlichen Betrachtungsweise macht es erforderlich, das Modell in verschiedene anforderungsspezifische Bereiche zu untergliedern und die einzelnen Teilmodelle miteinander zu verknüpfen.
Einen Überblick über das Grundverständnis und den Aufbau des Aachener PPS-Modells liefert der folgende Abschnitt. Im Anschluss daran erfolgt eine grundlegende Darstellung der Einsatzmöglichkeiten einzelner Modellteile, im Rahmen des Aachener PPS-Modells auch Referenzsichten genannt, sowie eine kurze inhaltliche Beschreibung der einzelnen Referenzsichten.
Aufgaben
(2012)
Aufgabe der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung (PPS) ist die termin-, kapazitäts- und mengenbezogene Planung und Steuerung der Fertigungs- und Montageprozesse. Während die Produktionsplanung den Inhalt und die Einzelprozesse der Fertigung und der Montage zu gestalten hat, regelt die Produktionssteuerung den Ablauf der Tätigkeiten in der Fertigung im Rahmen der Auftragsabwicklung. Dabei regelt die Produktionssteuerung, wann unter Berücksichtigung der Vorgaben der Produktionsplanung einerseits und der vorgegebenen logistischen Zielgrößen andererseits welche Teilprozesse in welcher Reihenfolge einen Produktionsfaktor beanspruchen.
A company can choose between three generic competitive strategies. Alongside the strategy of cost leadership are the strategy of differentiation and the strategy of focussing on niches, although we will not be discussing this latter any further here. The strategy of cost leadership is based on the achievement of “economies of scale”, so generating advantage from the benefits of cost reduction, learning curve effects and automation. In the strategy of differentiation the focus is on “economies of scope” which enable the customer-specific products to be offered, but this is generally achieved only with an increase in the complexity of products and processes. In the past it was assumed that these two strategies were mutually exclusive, as an increase in the economies of scale basically leads to a reduction in the economies of scope, and vice versa. But in order to survive in the international competitive arena companies in the high-wage countries need increasingly to offer individually tailored products at competitive prices. The target to be aimed at is therefore customer-specific products at the cost of mass production, so resolving the dilemma between economies of scale and economies of scope. For this it is necessary to optimise the alignment of all the structural elements in both the product and its production, because of the high level of their interdependence.
The areas on which we will focus our review and designs in the following will be what are known as product-production systems, or more briefly, production systems. This topic includes not only the resources and processes of the value creation systems, but also the products produced and offered on the market by a company as one connected entity. In order to tackle the challenges mentioned above, it is necessary to make it possible to measure and compare the current position of any given production system on the see-saw between economies of scale and economies of scope, and then be able to redesign specific facets of them as a second phase. A method of integrative evaluation and design of production systems is presented below for this purpose.
Industrial production in high-wage countries like Germany is still at risk. Yet, there are many counter-examples in which producing companies dominate their competitors by not only compensating for their specific disadvantages in terms of factor costs (e.g. wages, energy, duties and taxes) but rather by minimising waste using synchronising integrativity as well as by obtaining superior adaptivity on alternating conditions. In order to respond to the issue of economic sustainability of industrial production in high-wage countries, the leading production engineering and material research scientists of RWTH Aachen University together with renowned companies have established the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”. This compendium comprises the cluster’s scientific results as well as a selection of business and technology cases, in which these results have been successfully implemented into industrial practice in close cooperation with more than 30 companies of the industrial production sector.
Maximising economies of scale in individualised production is a vital issue for producing companies in high wage countries. A decisive enabler for this is the management of product and process complexity by systematic standardisation. Due to the strong and far-reaching impact of complexity on the value added chain, its management requires an integrative consideration of the entire product and production system.
The following paper introduces a methodology facing this challenge. The core element of this methodology is an integrative and complexity-focused assessment model. This assessment model has been validated experimentally by analysing key company data from more than 50 German toolmaking firms. Findings of this empirical investigation are presented in this paper.
Manufacturing companies of the machinery and equipment industry find themselves more than ever exposed to a rapidly changing competitive environment. In particular, the resulting diversity of planning and control processes confronts organisations and information systems with a significant coordination effort. To this day, planning and execution of order processing – from offer processing to the final shipment of the product – is still a part of the production planning and control (PPC), which is almost entirely integrated into information systems. Though, in order to manage dynamic influences on processes within order processing, there can be found a deficiency in the processing of decision-relevant and real-time information. Partly, the reason for this is a missing or incorrect feedback of process relevant data, so that the planning results, gained by the use of information systems, differ to the current process situation.
The concept of Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II) still represents the central logic of production planning and control. However, the centralised and push-oriented MRP II planning logic is not able to plan and measure dynamic processes adequately, which, due to diverse disturbances, often occur in production environments. Furthermore, specific weaknesses of MRP II-based systems are the lack of support for order releases, the planning principle based on average values and the successive planning method as well as the use of limited partial models. As a result a successive planning method leads to a dissection of PPC-tasks into smaller work packages and so strides away from a holistic approach and the achievement of an optimal solution. Similarly, a planning, focusing on a general business objective system, using a partial planning approach due to isolated considerations is not possible. Insufficient consideration of the current load horizon and the current capacity utilization, non-existing or delayed feedback on order progress as well as faults and poor availability and transparency of information can be named as further weaknesses of MRP II-based systems.
Remote services are services enabled by information and communication components and therefore do not require the physical presence of a service technician at the service object to provide a task. The impact of remote service on the capital goods industry has been increasingly significant over the recent yeas. Still many companies struggle with developing and implemenling successful business model, for remote service. This leads to a lot of unaccomplished benefits for the customer as well as for the companies themselves. A survey throughout companies in Ihe industrial machine and plant production sector was conducted in order to determine what successful companies do differently from those that cannot efficiently implement remote service business models.
The study presented in this chapter identifies key suceess factors of companies that effectively implemented remote services for their products. In order to identify the successful companies a scale for measuring remote service success was developed. Only by the use of this scale further findings regarding the success factors were possible. Key findings include the fact that successful companies actively market their remotle service to their customers. Generally they try to approach their remote service business from the operating company's perspective.