Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- 02 (4)
- 03 (2)
- Business analytics (2)
- Business ecosystems (1)
- Business-Ecosystems (1)
- Capacity Utilization (1)
- Circular economy (1)
- Co-Creation (1)
- Data-Centric Platform (1)
- Demand Forecasting (1)
Institute
The use of Business Analytics (BA) helps to improve the quality of decisions and reduces reaction latencies, especially in uncertain and volatile market situations. This expectation leads a continuously rising number of companies to make large investments in BA. The successful use of Business Analytics is increasingly becoming a differentiator. At the same time, the use of BA is not trivial, rather, it is subject to high socio-technical requirements. If these are not addressed, high risks arise that stand in the way of successful use. In particular, it is important to consider the risks in relation to the different types of BA in a differentiated way. So far, there is a lack of suitable approaches in the literature to consider these type-specific risks with regard to the socio-technical dimensions: people, technology, and organization. This paper addresses this gap by initially identifying risks in the use of Business Analytics. For this purpose, possible risks are identified using a systematic literature review and verified with a Delphi survey with various partners experienced in dealing with BA. Subsequently, the identified and validated risks are assigned to three different types of Business Analytics (Descriptive, Predictive and Prescriptive Analytics) and assessed in order to systematically address and reduce the risks. The result of this paper is an overview of the interactions between the socio-technically assigned risks, summarized in a risk catalog, and the different types of Business Analytics.
While digitization is a strategic advantage in numerous industries such as the automotive industry or mechanical engineering, other industries like the German quarrying industry have not yet established a transformation towards a digitized industry. This leads to inefficient work and inaccurate forecasting capabilities. To address these challenges, digital platforms can incentivize digitization
by supporting the capacity utilization and forecasting capability of these companies. In this paper, the quarrying industry is analyzed by a morphology and different types of companies are identified. Knowing the digital maturity of these companies and by determining the key factors to forecast demands and the capacity utilization, different operating models are derived. Combined with a morphology and the value creation system, different scenarios for the identification of platform services are examined. These scenarios are weighted in a utility analysis to get an operating model blueprint to develop and establish digital platforms in less digitized industries.
The manufacturing industry consumes 54% of global energy and attributes for 20% of global CO2 emissions, demonstrating the industry’s role as global driver of climate change. Therefore, reducing its carbon footprint has become a major challenge as its current energy and resource consumption are not sustainable. Industrie 4.0 presents a chance to transform the prevailing paradigms of industrial value creation and advance sustainable developments. By using information and communication technologies for the intelligent networking of machines and processes, it has the potential to reduce energy and material consumption and is considered a key contributor to sustainable manufacturing as proclaimed by the European Commission in the term “twin transition”. As organizations still struggle to utilize the potential of Industrie 4.0 for a sustainable transformation, this paper presents a framework to successfully align their own twin transition. The framework is built upon three key design principles (micro level: leverage eco-efficient operations, meso level: facilitate circularity and macro level: foster value co-creation) derived using case study research by Eisenhardt, and four structural dimensions (resources, information systems, organizational structure and culture) based on the acatech Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Eleven interconnected areas of action are defined within the framework and offer a holistic and practical approach on how to leverage an organization’s twin transition. Within the conducted research, the framework was applied to the challenge of information quality and transparency required for high-value secondary plastics in the manufacturing industry. The result is a digital platform design that enables information transactions for secondary plastics and establishes a circular ecosystem. This shows the applicability of the framework and its potential to facilitate a structured approach for designing twin transitions in the manufacturing industry.
Europa als erster klimaneutraler Kontinent bis 2050 – unter diesem ambitionierten Ziel treibt die Europäische Union eines der größten Transformationsprogramme dieses Jahrhunderts voran. Das Leben und die Gesellschaft wie sie heute existiert, werden in allen Bereichen signifikanten Musterwechseln unterliegen. Von zentraler Bedeutung bei dieser Transformation wird die Mobilität von Personen und Gütern sein. Eine Reduktion von 90 % der Treibhausgasemissionen soll in weniger als drei Dekaden realisiert werden. Insbesondere im Bereich der Urbanen Logistik ist ein nahtloses Zusammenspiel der verschiedensten Akteure, unterstützt durch neuartige digitale und physische Infrastrukturen, notwendig, um eine nachhaltige Zielerreichung bei mindestens konstantem Serviceniveau sicherzustellen. Cross-industrielle Ansätze, die über das Zusammenspiel von komplementären Lösungsbausteinen Co-Creation ermöglichen, werden zum zentralen Wettbewerbsvorteil für alle Akteure. Die Gestaltung von Business Ecosystems rückt deshalb zunehmend in den Fokus und wird aufgrund des enormen Potenzials für die Urbane Logistik in diesem Beitrag beleuchtet.