Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (14)
- Conference Proceeding (35)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Internet Paper (3)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (72)
Keywords
- 02 (5)
- 03 (1)
- Aachener PPS-Modell (1)
- Adaptability (1)
- Additive Fertigung (1)
- Adherence To Delivery Dates (1)
- Anlaufmanagement (1)
- Assembly (1)
- Assistance Systems (1)
- Automobilindustrie (1)
- Beratung (1)
- Big Data (2)
- BigPro (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- CPSL (1)
- Change Management (1)
- Change Request (2)
- Changeability (1)
- Co-Creation (1)
- Crisis management (1)
- Customer Perspective (1)
- Cyber physical production control (1)
- Data Quality (1)
- Data analytics (1)
- Data-driven decision (1)
- Datenaustausch (2)
- Datenmanagement (1)
- Datensouveränität (1)
- Decision Support (2)
- Decision Support System (1)
- Decision support (1)
- Design of Experiments (1)
- Deviation Detection (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Digitalization (1)
- Discrete Event Simulation (1)
- Disruption Management (1)
- Disruptions (1)
- Distribution (1)
- Distributionsplanung (1)
- Disturbance Management (1)
- Do-it-together (1)
- EPCIS (1)
- ERP (2)
- ERP-System (1)
- Echtzeitfähige Systeme (1)
- Echtzeitfähigkeit (1)
- End-2-End-Transparenz (1)
- Enterprise-Resource-Planning (1)
- Entscheidungsunterstützung (3)
- Ersatzteillogistik (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Event Data (1)
- Expertise (1)
- Fallstudien (1)
- Feedback data (1)
- Finanzkrise (1)
- Flexible manufacturing system (1)
- Footprint design (1)
- Forschungsbeirat (1)
- Furniture Production Process (1)
- Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- Global production (1)
- Humanitarian logistics (1)
- IT-Architektur (1)
- IT-Unterstützung (1)
- Incorrect Data (1)
- Industrie 4.0 (3)
- Information Logistics (1)
- Information Transparency (1)
- Innovative Furniture (1)
- Insufficient Data (1)
- Interface definition (1)
- Internet of Production (4)
- Internet of Things (1)
- KI (2)
- KMAT (1)
- KMU (1)
- KPI (2)
- Kennzahlen (1)
- Key-Performance-Indicator (1)
- Knowledge representation (1)
- Konferenz (1)
- Konfigurierbare Materialien (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Konzepte (1)
- Krise (1)
- Kybernetik (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (2)
- Lean Manufacturing (1)
- Lebensmittelindustrie (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (2)
- Lieferketten (1)
- Logistik (3)
- Logistikdienstleister (1)
- MES (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Manufacturing Execution System (1)
- Maschinen- und Anlagenbau (1)
- Maturity Model, Maturity Index (1)
- Mechanical and Plant Engineering (1)
- Mixed-Model Assembly (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Natural-Language-Processing (1)
- Network configuration (1)
- Online retail (1)
- Onlinehandel (1)
- Operations planning (1)
- Order Quantity (1)
- PPC (1)
- PPS (3)
- PPS-Buch (1)
- Performance-Management (1)
- Plattform Industrie 4.0 (1)
- Procurement Strategy (1)
- Product Characteristics (1)
- Production Control (3)
- Production Management System (1)
- Production Planning (1)
- Production management (2)
- Production networks (1)
- Produktdatenmanagement (1)
- Produktentwicklung (1)
- Produktionsmanagement (2)
- Produktionsplanung (6)
- Produktionsplanung und -steuerung (2)
- Produktionssteuerung (6)
- Produktionssystem (2)
- Reaktionsfähigkeit (1)
- Replenishment Time (1)
- Resource deployment (1)
- Rezepte (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- SCEM (1)
- SCM (2)
- SV7113 (1)
- SV7169 (1)
- SV7213 (1)
- SV7261 (1)
- SV7266 (1)
- SV7276 (1)
- SV7289 (1)
- SV7420 (1)
- SV7436 (1)
- SV7459 (1)
- Scenario pattern (1)
- Scenario technique (1)
- Selbstoptimierung (2)
- Setup time optimizing sequencing (1)
- Similarity Analysis (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Smart Services (1)
- Social Manufacturing (1)
- Softwaretool (1)
- Studie (2)
- Störungsmanagement (2)
- Suchmaschine (1)
- Supply Chain Event Management (2)
- Supply Risks (1)
- Supply chain (1)
- Supply-Chain (1)
- Supply-Chain-Design (2)
- Supply-Chain-Management (10)
- Supply-Chain-Networks (1)
- Supply-Chain-Resilienz (1)
- Sustainability (2)
- Task View (1)
- Trends (1)
- Typification (1)
- Unternehmensberatung (1)
- Variantenfließfertigung (1)
- Viable System Model (2)
- Visual Analytics (1)
- Whitepaper (1)
- Wirtschaftskrise (1)
- analysis of potential (1)
- attribute and data harmonization (1)
- blockchain (1)
- blockchain-based services (1)
- bullwhip effect (1)
- classification systems (1)
- control theory (1)
- counter measures (1)
- cyber-physische Systeme (1)
- cybernetics (1)
- data democratization (1)
- decision making (1)
- decision support (2)
- design (1)
- deviation detection (1)
- digital services (1)
- digital shadow (1)
- digitale Technologien (1)
- digitale Transformation (1)
- disruption management (1)
- disruptions (1)
- disturbance management (2)
- enterprise resource planning system (1)
- fourth industrial revolution (1)
- human-robot collaboration (1)
- hybride Systeme (1)
- inventory management (2)
- logistics (1)
- machine learning (1)
- machinery and plant engineering industry (1)
- order (1)
- order processing (1)
- process mining (1)
- procurement (1)
- procurement strategy (1)
- production control (1)
- production management (1)
- production network (1)
- production networks (1)
- production planning and control (1)
- reaction strategy (1)
- realtime capability (1)
- recursion level (1)
- resilience (1)
- rev (9)
- supply chain (3)
- supply chain event management (1)
- supply chain management (2)
- supply risks (1)
- system dynamics (3)
- textile supply chain (1)
- viable system model (2)
- Änderungsmanagement (2)
Institute
- Produktionsmanagement (72) (remove)
High Resolution Supply Chain Management aims to counteract the trend towards more and more centralised and rigid enterprises. Today, most companies strive to increase efficiency of business processes applying highly sophisticated, centralised planning approaches. These centralised approaches limit the companies’ ability to react flexibly and act adaptively due to external and internal turbulences. In today’s buyer’s markets companies usually try to bypass these turbulences keeping high levels of inventory resulting in a low overall efficiency. High Resolution Supply Chain Management tries to solve the problem at its root from a holistic perspective. Based on the Viable System Model developed by Stafford Beer a four-dimensional holistic production management system model, embedding an organisational structure view, an cause and action view, a control loop perspective and a decision making level has been elaborated. The basis of this model is the integration of all four perspectives into an interacting framework.
High Resolution Supply Chain Management (HRSCM) aims to stop the trend of continuously increasing planning complexity. Today, companies in high-wage countries mostly strive for further optimization of their processes with sophisticated, capital-intensive planning approaches. The capability to adapt flexibly to dynamically changing conditions is limited by the inflexible and centralized planning logic. Thus, flexibility is reached currently by expensive inventory stocks and overcapacities in order to cope with rescheduling of supply or delivery. HRSCM describes the establishment of a complete information transparency in supply chains with the goal of assuring the availability of goods through decentralized, self-optimizing control loops for Production Planning and Control (PPC). HRSCM pursues the idea of enabling organization structures and processes to adapt to dynamic conditions. The approach includes the strengths of the existing planning models as well as the process of decision making in organizations. A precondition for this decentralized adaptation is the synchronization of the objectives of the several units or process owners. The basis for this new PPC Model are information transparency, stable processes, consistent customer orientation, increased capacity flexibility and the understanding of the production system as a viable, socio-technical system.
The efficient dealing with the dynamic environment of production industries is one of the most challenging tasks of Supply Chain Management in high-wage countries. Relevant and current information are still not used sufficiently, to handle the influence of the dynamic environment on intra- and inter-company order processing adequately. Among other things, the problem is caused by missing or delayed feedback of relevant data. As a consequence of that, planning results differ from the actual situation of production. High Resolution Supply Chain Management describes an approach aiming on high information transparency in supply chains in combination with decentralized, self-optimizing control loops for Production Planning and Control. The final objective is to enable manufacturing companies to produce efficiently and to be able to react to order-variations at any time, requiring process structures to be most flexible.
Die Finanzkrise hat viele Unternehmen kalt erwischt. Die Folgen des Konjunktureinbruchs sind drastische Absatzeinbrüche, Produktionsstopps und Liquiditätsengpässe. Die Tendenz zur Wertminderung der Produkte zwingt vor allem Industrieunternehmen, Abschreibungen auf ihre Bestände vorzunehmen. Dies gilt insbesondere für die äusserst dynamischen und hochwertigen Lagerbestände im Automobilbau, Maschinenbau oder der chemischen Industrie.
Auf Basis einer systematischen Literaturanalyse wurden insgesamt 11 Kennzahlen identifiziert, welche die Grundlage zur Beschreibung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit von Unternehmen bilden. Die Kennzahlen wurden in die vier Leistungsdimensionen Effizienz, Qualität, Zeit und Flexibilität eingeteilt.
Eine wesentliche Bedingung zur Optimierung der Wertschöpfungsprozesse ist die Transparenz über die leistungsbestimmenden Faktoren eines Unternehmens. Die Ermittlung dieser Faktoren stellt für viele Industriebetriebe eine Herausforderung dar. Im Rahmen der Veröffentlichung wird daher eine Vorgehensweise zur systematischen Identifikation von Einflussfaktoren der Unternehmenskennzahlen vorgestellt, welche die Grundlage zur Ableitung von individuellen Stellhebeln zur Steigerung der Unternehmensleistungsfähigkeit darstellt.
Recent developments have demonstrated the challenges and impacts of disruptions in supply chains. Current disruptions especially affected procurement and have indicated a lack of resilience. Resilience aims at being prepared, decreasing the impact, and enabling fast reactions and adaption in case of disruptions. The systematic design of resilience in procurement is significantly influenced by proactive and strategic actions before disruptions occur. Thus, the procurement strategy plays a major role when increasing resilience. The procurement strategy is influenced by various factors. Thus, a data-based approach for its systematic design is required. Based on the vision of the Internet of Production (IoP), this paper presents a data-based approach for designing procurement strategies. The IoP is a framework that enables cross-domain collaboration by providing semantically adequate and contextual data from production, development, and usage in real-time at an appropriate granularity. The paper aims at analyzing the state of the art regarding the design of procurement strategy in uncertain environments and the identification of success-critical purchased articles. Based on this, an approach is developed that is structured along the action research cycle and uses CRISP-DM to further detail the different steps. Through the use of these frameworks, both practical applicability and objective evaluation are ensured. The proposed approach thus allows the systematic evaluation of purchased articles regarding supply risks and lies the foundation for the adaption of the procurement strategy. The resulting approach is the foundation for future practical application of different use cases. As one central use case for the presented approach, the paper introduces the textile industry and its supply chains.
Industrie 4.0 is all around us today: in politics, in the media, and on the agendas of researchers and entrepreneurs. Smarter, faster, more personalized, more efficient, more integrated – those are just some of the promises of this new industrial era. The potential, especially for Germany ́s mechanical
engineering industry and plant engineering sector, is indeed great, both for providers and for users of technologies across the spectrum of Industrie 4.0.
But there are still many unresolved questions, uncertainties, and challenges. Our readiness study seeks to address this need and offer insight. Because Industrie 4.0 will not happen on its own.
This study is intended to bring the grand vision closer to the business reality. We also highlight the challenging milestones that many companies must still pass on the road to Industrie 4.0 readiness.
The study examines where companies in the fields of mechanical and plant engineering currently stand, focusing on what motivates them and what holds them back, and on the differences that emerge between small and medium enterprises on the one hand and large enterprises on the other.
The results make it possible for the first time to develop a detailed, systematic picture of Industrie 4.0 readiness in the engineering sector.
The study concludes with recommendations for action in the business community, complementing the diverse suite of programs and activities offered by VDMA’s Forum Industrie 4.0. We would like to take this opportunity to thank the two sponsors of this project from the VDMA Forum, Dietmar Goericke and Dr. Christian Mosch, whose efforts played a critical role in making this study a success.
We are convinced that Industrie 4.0 can become a success story for Germany’s engineering sector. May our “Industrie 4.0 Readiness” study do its part in this effort.
Industrie 4.0 ist in Politik, Medien, Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft derzeit omnipräsent. Intelligenter, individueller, effizienter, schneller, vernetzter – so lauten nur einige Versprechen dieses neuen industriellen Zeitalters. Tatsächlich sind die Potenziale gerade für den deutschen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau gewaltig: Sowohl für Anbieter als auch für Anwender von Technologien rund um das Thema Industrie 4.0. Aber noch existieren viele ungelöste Fragen, Unsicherheiten und Aufgaben. Hier wollen wir mit unserer Readiness-Studie ansetzen und Hilfestellung leisten. Denn ein Selbstläufer wird Industrie 4.0 nicht. Mit der vorliegenden Studie soll die große Vision näher an die betriebliche Realität gebracht werden. Auch zeigen wir die anspruchsvollen Wegmarken auf, die für viele Unternehmen hinsichtlich ihrer Industrie 4.0-Fähigkeit noch zu passieren sind. Die Studie untersucht, an welcher Stelle der Maschinen- und Anlagenbau aktuell bei der Umsetzung steht. Motivation und Hemmnisse der Unternehmen werden ebenso in den Blick genommen wie die Unterschiede, die sich zwischen Mittelstand und großen Unternehmen ergeben. Im Ergebnis ist es erstmals möglich, die „Industrie 4.0-Readiness“ der Maschinenbau-Industrie detailliert und systematisch abzubilden.
Klar Schiff
(2009)
Im Rahmen dieser Studie untersuchten das Forschungsinstitut für Rationalisierung e. V. an der RWTH Aachen und die Universität St. Gallen
(Lehrstuhl Produktionsmanagement) 24 Veröffentlichungen von 11 Beratungsunternehmen. Dabei wurden über 200 Aussagen zur Bewältigung der Krise bewertungsneutral identifiziert und analysiert.