Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (13)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (62)
- Conference Proceeding (114)
- Contribution to a Periodical (25)
- Lecture (7)
- Internet Paper (2)
- Report (2)
- Working Paper (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (232)
Keywords
- 02 (15)
- 03 (9)
- 04 (1)
- 5G (2)
- 7. EU-Forschungsrahmenprogramm (1)
- AI (2)
- APMS (1)
- APS (1)
- Aachener PPS-Modell (1)
- Ablauforganisation (1)
Institute
- Business Transformation (10)
- Dienstleistungsmanagement (67)
- FIR e. V. an der RWTH Aachen (232)
- Informationsmanagement (51)
- Produktionsmanagement (115)
Companies in the manufacturing industry are shifting towards a more service-oriented business model. One major challenge of this transformation is the information exchange between the different stages of the product-service-lifecycle.
We extend the existing body of knowledge by conducting an empirical study in the German manufacturing industry, addressing the cause-effect relationship between 1) information gathering over the product-service-lifecycle, 2) data analytics 3) interpretation and use of new information and 4) distribution of new product related information and the impact of these four aspects on performance.
The analysis reveals five different success factors with a significant impact on innovation and operation excellence. The implications from our research can help to develop new and more practical oriented Lifecycle-Product-Service-System approaches on the one hand. On the other hand it enables companies to focus on activities leading to higher service efficiency. Creating new stimuli will transform their existing business model to a more service-oriented one.
More and more manufacturing companies are starting to transform the transaction-based business model into a customer value-based subscription business to monetize the potential of digitization in times of saturated markets. However, historically evolved, linear acquisition processes, focusing the transactionoriented product sales, prevent this development substantially. Elemental features of the subscription business such as recurring payments, short-term release cycles, data-driven learning, and a focus on customer success are not considered in this approach. Since existing transactional-driven acquisition approaches are not successfully applicable to the subscription business, a systematic approach to an acquisition cycle of the subscription business in the manufacturing industry is presented, aiming at a long-term participative business. Applying a grounded theory approach, a task-oriented model for themanufacturing industry was developed.
The model consisting of five main tasks and 14 basis tasks serves as best practice to support manufacturing companies in adapting or redesigning acquisition activities for their subscription business models.
A large number of product-accompanying services in the machinery and plant engineering industry is based on the cross-company exchange of data and information. By providing services, additional sales potential on the manufacturer side as well as far-reaching product and process advantages for appliers can be reached. However, the necessary cross-company exchange of information is nowadays limited due to a lack of trust in the interacting partner and the applicable existing technologies, which results in significant losses in the terms of business potential. The uncovering of this potential now seems to be made possible by the use of the Blockchain technology. Through the key factors security, immutability, transparency and decentralisation, it serves as an enabler for cross-company communication and product-accompanying services. The technological implementation of a Blockchain can take on a broad spectrum of attributes, which can lead to decisive restrictions for the execution of services. This justifies the necessity for a qualified and context-related assessment of service-types-individual specifications and the resulting requirements on the system. Within the scope of this paper, different types of product-accompanying services are identified and analysed regarding their requirements for a Blockchain-based machinery and plant connection. This can serve as a basis for a qualified and goal-oriented configuration of the Blockchain.
Blockchain as Middleware+
(2019)
In supporting decision making of manufacturing companies, the added value of cross-domain data exchange for aggregating information is well established in enterprise organization research and is represented, for example, in the reference model “Internet of Production” (IoP). Currently, there is little research regarding the role of Blockchain technology in such a reference model and how specifically the IoP needs to be expanded to address cross-company data exchange. This paper presents a proposal for such an extension to outline the use of Blockchain technology and to elaborate the open research demands for implementation. In particular, desk research and the development of concrete use cases for cross-company data exchange between business application systems were carried out. The results are, on the one hand, extending the IoP by a third dimension, which corresponds to the supply chain, and, on the other hand clarification of the role Blockchain technology can take in this context.
This paper won the John Burbidge Best Paper Award (see Attachment 2).
Vor dem Hintergrund des unvorhersehbaren Unternehmensumfelds gewinnt das Risiko-Management in Produktionsnetzwerken zunehmend an Bedeutung. Um den dynamischen Anforderungen gerecht zu werden, ist der Aufbau von Flexibilitätspotenzialen besonders wichtig. Da jedoch für die auftragsspezifische Fertigung keine Sicherheitsbestände aufgebaut werden können, ist ein alternativer Ansatz zur Flexibilitätssicherung zu finden. Im diesem Artikel wird ein Ansatz zur Bewertung des Nutzens der Bestellflexibilität vorgestellt.
Nowadays, the market for information and communication technologies used for IOT-applications grows daily. Since companies need technologies to transform their business processes corresponding to the digital revolution, they need to know which technologies are available, and fit the best for their use case. Their inertial issue is the lacking overview of technologies suitable to connect their production or logistics. Hence, this paper presents a methodology to select technologies (and combinations) based on their functions. It differentiates between information and communication technologies, digital technologies and connecting technologies by the physical function and its role in a cyber-physical system. Depending on the use case, the applicability of every technology varies. Due to that reason, the paper illustrates a ranked qualification of the technologies for typical use cases, focussing tracking and tracing issues in the intralogistics of producing companies. The evaluation is performed upon a literature research, a market study to identify suitable technologies, and various expert interviews to assess the applicability of the technologies.
Eine Transformation findet einen Abschluss, nachdem der gewünschte Zielzustand erreicht wurde. Wie sieht es bei der digitalen Transformation aus? Kann es im Hinblick auf technologische Entwicklungen jemals zu einem Ende kommen? Oder befindet sich ein Unternehmen hierbei in einer kontinuierlichen Transformation durch die Weiterentwicklung der Digitalisierung? Wenn ja, wie kann ein Unternehmen mit diesem ständigen Wandel effizient und sicher umgehen? (Quelle: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-63758-6_17 )
Auftragsmanagement
(2014)
Ausgelöst durch einen konkreten Kundenauftrag, plant, steuert und überwacht das Auftragsmanagement sämtliche Aktivitäten der Auftragsabwicklung von der Anfragenbearbeitung über die Konstruktion, den Einkauf, die Fertigung und Montage bis hin zum Versand des fertigen Produkts. Dabei wird im Auftragsmanagement das Ziel verfolgt, die Transparenz der Auftragsabwicklung zu erhöhen und damit die Reaktionsfähigkeit im Hinblick auf unternehmensinterne und -externe Störungen deutlich zu verbessern. Gleichzeitig unterstützt das Auftragsmanagement die Lösung von Interessenskonflikten zwischen verschiedenen Fachbereichen sowie die Ausregelung von Zielkonflikten im Sinne einer effizienten Erfüllung des Kundenauftrags.
Teilaufgaben des Auftragsmanagements sind die Angebotsbearbeitung, die Auftragsbearbeitung sowie die Auftragskoordination und das Auftragscontrolling. In diesem Kapitel werden zunächst die Kernaufgaben des Auftragsmanagements definiert und anschließend die wesentlichen Methoden und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung der verschiedenen Teilaufgaben innerhalb des Auftragsmanagements zusammengestellt. Abschließend werden die Aufgaben des Auftragsmanagements in ihrer zeitlogischen Abfolge in Form eines Referenzprozessmodells modelliert und dabei fertigungstypspezifisch detailliert.
Aufgaben
(2012)
Aufgabe der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung (PPS) ist die termin-, kapazitäts- und mengenbezogene Planung und Steuerung der Fertigungs- und Montageprozesse. Während die Produktionsplanung den Inhalt und die Einzelprozesse der Fertigung und der Montage zu gestalten hat, regelt die Produktionssteuerung den Ablauf der Tätigkeiten in der Fertigung im Rahmen der Auftragsabwicklung. Dabei regelt die Produktionssteuerung, wann unter Berücksichtigung der Vorgaben der Produktionsplanung einerseits und der vorgegebenen logistischen Zielgrößen andererseits welche Teilprozesse in welcher Reihenfolge einen Produktionsfaktor beanspruchen.
Companies in high wage countries are increasingly confronted with the challenge of optimizing economies of scope and economies of scale simultaneously to succeed on a global market place. An integrated assessment of production systems facing this challenge is essential to evaluate the actual state of a company and to provide a basis for drawing the right conclusions to reconfigure production systems successfully.
In this paper an integrated model for measuring economies of scope as well as economies of scale is introduced, defining the fundamental domains of a production system. The major objectives resulting from the overall scale-scope dilemma are broken down for each domain and the main dimensions for an assessment of each domain are defined. A new measure named Degree of Efficiency is defined, quantifying the fulfillment of the opposing objectives in each domain and hence, the contribution to an overall resolution of the scale-scope dilemma.