Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Book (2)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Conference Proceeding (16)
- Contribution to a Periodical (11)
- doctorallecture (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Lecture (2)
- Internet Paper (1)
- Report (6)
Language
- German (32)
- English (23)
- Multiple languages (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (56)
Keywords
- 02 (1)
- 3D-Druck (1)
- AR (1)
- Additive Fertigung (1)
- Additive manufacturing (1)
- After-Sales (1)
- Arbeitswelt 4.0 (1)
- As-a-Service (1)
- Business Model (1)
- Business model (1)
Institute
- Dienstleistungsmanagement (56) (remove)
Customer Lifetime Value
(2020)
Today, however, agility is seen more than ever as a critical success factor for companies. In times of an increasing degree of digital interconnection and minimum viable products, a mentality is entering the industrial service sector that has so far only been exemplified by Internet companies (e.g. Google): New products and especially digital services are developed in highly iterative processes. To this end, customers are involved in early test phases of development and provide feedback on individual functional modules, which – in contrast to the previous approach – are only gradually assembled into a market-ready “100 percent version”. But especially with the development of new digital services, companies must ensure more than ever that both the existing analog service business and the design of new digital services are geared to effectiveness and efficiency in order to meet the growing demands of customers and competitors.
To achieve this, companies must not only be familiar with the products currently on the market, but also master the entire product history, which in some cases goes back more than 30 years and varies greatly from one industry to another.
This paper contributes to an assessment framework for valuing data as an asset. Particularly industrial manufacturers developing and delivering Smart Product Service Systems (Smart PSS) are comprehensively depended on the business value derived by processing data. However, there is a lack in a framework for capturing and comparing the Smart PSS data value with the purpose of increasing the accountability of data initiatives. Therefore a qualitative data value assessment approach was developed and specified on Smart PSS, based on an industrial case study research. [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_39]
Smart-Farming-Welt
(2019)
Smart-Farming-Welt
(2019)
Monetizing Industry 4.0: Design Principles for Subscription Business in the Manufacturing Industry
(2019)
Subscription business models have a major role for monetizing products and services for manufacturing companies in the age of Industry 4.0. As the manufacturing industry has difficulties generating revenues through digitalization, the implementation of innovative business models are essential to remain successful. Physical assets are often capital-intensive and require a more complex manufacturing process than subscription business models. Moreover, subscription models can focus on the individual customer benefit and a consistent service transformation, constituting a unique selling proposition and a competitive advantage. Hence, the following paper provides a management model that enables manufacturing companies to successfully realize the transformation towards a subscription business model. The management model presents four major fields of action, each matched with one design principle that must be considered when dealing with subscription models in the manufacturing industry. These principles were determined by an in-depth case study analysis among various manufacturing companies. Opportunities, challenges and recommendations for action were then systematically derived and integrated into the management model.
Über die Hälfte der KMU des Maschinenbaus passen ihre am Markt angebotenen AS-DL nicht oder unstrukturiert an, indem sie ad hoc auf Kundenanliegen reagieren (KAMPKER 2015). Es existiert kein standardisiertes Vorgehen zur systematischen Identifikation und Umsetzung notwendiger Änderungen von AS-DL. Hierbei entstehen Ineffizienzen in der Nutzung vorhandener Ressourcen (z.B. Personalkapazität). Dies ist insbesondere ein Problem in der Kleinserienfertigung des Maschinenbaus, da grundsätzlich eine hohe Variantenvielfalt und Kundenindividualisierung besteht. Dies erhöht massiv die Komplexität der Dienstleistungserbringung, da sich Maschinen aber auch Kundenwünsche viel häufiger ändern als in der Großserienfertigung. Ein Service-Release-Management trägt dazu bei, die Effizienz der Ressourcen im Bereich AS-DL zu steigern.
Aus wissenschaftlich-technischer Sicht fehlt ein Vorgehen, um notwendige Änderungen von AS-DL systematisch zu identifizieren und effizient in ein Service-Release umzusetzen. Hierfür ist ein spezifisches Service-Release-Management notwendig. Dieses soll es KMU ermöglichen, notwendige Änderungen an AS-DL systematisch zu identifizieren, Service-Releases zu gestalten, deren Durchführbarkeit und Wirtschaftlichkeit zu bewerten sowie Service-Releases umzusetzen (RANA ET AL. 2014). Die Forschungsfrage des Vorhabens lautet:
Wie ist ein Service-Release-Management zu gestalten, damit KMU in der Kleinserienfertigung des Maschinenbaus notwendige Änderungen an ihren AS-DL systematisch identifizieren, daraus Service-Releases gestalten und diese Service-Releases effizient umsetzen können?
- Wie können Auslöser identifiziert werden, die dazu führen, dass eine AS-DL geändert werden muss?
- Wie ist ein Service-Release in Abhängigkeit der Auslöser zu gestalten?
- Wie können Service-Releases (unter Berücksichtigung der Strategie des AS-DLGeschäfts) hinsichtlich ihrer technischen, rechtlichen und kompetenzbasierten Durchführbarkeit geprüft werden?
- Wie können Service-Releases hinsichtlich ihrer Wirtschaftlichkeit bewertet werden?
- Wie wird ein Service-Release erfolgreich eingeführt?
Service Engineering Models
(2019)
Since the field of service engineering emerged in the late 20th century, the service industry has undergone drastic changes. Among the reasons for these changes is the increasing digitalization, which has made it difficult for companies to successfully develop new service offerings. While numerous service engineering models are available to provide guidance during the design of new services, many of them cannot keep up with the requirements of today’s economic environment. The present paper examines the requirements that service engineering models need to meet in order to be suitable guidelines for the digital age. To this end, the introduction illustrates how digitalization has changed the service industry. Afterwards, selected service engineering models and related norms are presented. Finally, a set of requirements for modern service engineering models derived from best practices from recent years is introduced.
Industrie 4.0 ist in den Bilanzen deutscher Industrieunternehmen aktuell noch nicht angekommen. Seit der Einführung des Begriffs „Industrie 4.0“, als Bezeichnung für die massenhafte Verbindung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien mit der industriellen Produktion, wird das Thema national wie international in Wirtschaft und Forschung in zahlreichen Initiativen und Projekten behandelt. Enorme wirtschaftliche Potenziale wurden und werden in diversen Studien beziffert, um den revolutionären Charakter dieser Entwicklung zu unterstreichen.